Nutrafol and Viviscal are the two most clinically studied hair supplements on the market, and the two most frequently compared by consumers. Both have published clinical trials. Both are used primarily by women with thinning hair. And both are substantially more expensive than most supplements.
But they work through completely different mechanisms, are targeted at different root causes, and have meaningfully different price points. This comparison covers the evidence, the differences, and which one is more likely to be appropriate for your situation.
Quick Answer
Viviscal wins on value ($40/mo vs $88/mo) with solid clinical backing. Nutrafol's broader multi-mechanism formula — adaptogens, saw palmetto, anti-inflammatory — may be more relevant if stress or DHT is driving your hair loss. For most people, Viviscal is the right starting point.
How Do They Work? Completely Different Mechanisms
This is the most important distinction.
Viviscal uses marine collagen (AminoMar Complex). The core active ingredient is AminoMar — a proprietary marine protein complex derived from shark cartilage and oyster shell extract. The theory: hair follicles require specific amino acids and structural proteins to produce strong, healthy hair shafts. By providing bioavailable marine-derived proteins and micronutrients, Viviscal nourishes follicles from the inside. It also contains vitamin C, biotin, and zinc to support keratin production. This is an approach aimed at nutritional support and follicle nourishment — it does not address hormonal drivers (DHT) or stress pathways.
Nutrafol uses adaptogens, saw palmetto, and anti-inflammatory botanicals. Nutrafol's formula is more mechanistically diverse. It includes:
- Saw palmetto — mild 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (blocks some DHT)
- Ashwagandha — adaptogen that may reduce cortisol, addressing stress-related hair loss
- Curcumin — anti-inflammatory, targeting scalp inflammation
- Tocotrienols (vitamin E complex) — antioxidant, anti-inflammatory
- Marine collagen and biotin — structural support
Nutrafol's pitch is that hair loss has multiple root causes — DHT, stress (elevated cortisol), inflammation, nutritional deficiency — and a multi-mechanism supplement addresses them together. This is a theoretically coherent approach, even if the evidence for the combination is mostly from Nutrafol's own funded studies.
Head-to-Head Comparison Table
| | Nutrafol | Viviscal | |---|---|---| | Primary mechanism | Adaptogens + DHT blocker + anti-inflammatory | Marine collagen (AminoMar) + micronutrients | | Key active ingredients | Saw palmetto, ashwagandha, curcumin, tocotrienols | AminoMar marine protein complex, biotin, zinc | | Addresses DHT | Yes (saw palmetto — mild) | No | | Addresses stress/cortisol | Yes (ashwagandha) | No | | Addresses nutritional deficiency | Partially | Primarily | | Clinical trials | Yes (company-funded, small) | Yes (company-funded, small to mid-size) | | Price per month | ~$88 | ~$40 | | Formulas available | Men, Women, Women's Balance, Postpartum | Men, Women | | Available OTC | Yes (Amazon, direct) | Yes (Amazon, direct) |
What Does the Clinical Evidence Show?
Viviscal Evidence
Viviscal has several published randomized controlled trials:
- A 2012 study in the Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology enrolled 60 women with female pattern thinning. At 6 months, the Viviscal group showed significantly more terminal hairs and less telogen hair shedding compared to placebo.
- A 2015 RCT in men showed significant improvement in hair count vs. placebo at 3 and 6 months.
- Studies have generally used doses consistent with the commercial product.
The evidence quality is reasonable for a supplement — the studies are placebo-controlled and published in peer-reviewed journals. They are small and company-affiliated, which is the universal limitation of supplement research.
Nutrafol Evidence
Nutrafol has also funded clinical studies:
- A 2018 open-label study in women showed significant improvements in hair growth velocity, thickness, and shine at 6 months.
- A 2022 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in women with self-perceived hair thinning showed statistically significant improvement in growth rate and thickness at 6 months.
- The company has published multiple internal studies, and a few independent researchers have examined the individual ingredients (saw palmetto, tocotrienols, ashwagandha) with positive results in different contexts.
Nutrafol's evidence base has expanded in recent years. The limitation is the same as Viviscal — small, company-funded studies rather than large independent trials.
The Honest Assessment
Neither supplement has the evidence base of finasteride or minoxidil. Both have clinical support that is better than most supplements, but the studies are small, often open-label or company-funded, and the effect sizes are modest. These are not miracle treatments. They are supplements with real but limited evidence for hair health support.
For people with androgenetic alopecia, neither supplement is a substitute for prescription DHT blockers if effective treatment is the goal.
Cost: Viviscal Wins Clearly
At $88/month for Nutrafol versus approximately $40/month for Viviscal, this is a meaningful price difference over a year:
- Nutrafol: $1,056/year
- Viviscal: $480/year
For a treatment that requires 6+ months to show results and should probably be continued indefinitely to maintain them, the cost difference adds up. The clinical evidence does not clearly justify the Nutrafol price premium for most users.
The exception: if your hair loss is primarily stress-driven or DHT-driven, Nutrafol's additional mechanisms (ashwagandha, saw palmetto) may be worth the premium specifically for you.
Who Should Choose Each?
Choose Viviscal if:
- You want the best value with solid clinical backing
- Your hair loss is related to nutritional depletion, postpartum recovery, or diffuse thinning without a strong hormonal driver
- You are breastfeeding or need a lower-risk ingredient profile (though still consult a doctor)
- Budget is a significant consideration
Choose Nutrafol if:
- You have identifiable stress-related hair loss — high cortisol, recent prolonged stress
- You suspect a mild DHT component and want to address it without prescription medication
- You have been through postpartum recovery and the hair loss continues with a stress or hormonal component
- You want a broader multi-mechanism formula and price is secondary
For women with postpartum hair loss specifically, see our best postpartum supplements guide for the full comparison in that context.
Our Verdict
For most people, Viviscal is the better starting point — solid evidence, half the price, and specifically validated in female pattern thinning and diffuse hair loss.
Nutrafol is worth the premium if stress, elevated cortisol, or mild DHT activity is your primary concern. The adaptogens and saw palmetto differentiate it meaningfully from Viviscal for this use case.
Both supplements are adjuncts — they are not replacements for effective treatment if your hair loss is significant or progressive. Neither approaches the efficacy of finasteride or minoxidil for androgenetic alopecia.
If you are considering either supplement alongside prescription treatment, there is no known interaction concern with minoxidil or finasteride — they can be used together.
Sources
- Ablon G. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of an oral supplement in women with self-perceived thinning hair. Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology. 2012;5(11):28-34. PMID: 23198010.
- Ablon G, Dayan S. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, extension study evaluating the efficacy of a new oral supplement in women with self-perceived thinning hair. Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology. 2015;8(12):15-21. PMID: 26705448.
- Wickett RR, Kossmann E, Buras A, et al. Effect of oral intake of choline-stabilized orthosilicic acid on hair tensile strength and morphology in women with fine hair. Archives of Dermatological Research. 2007;299(10):499-505. PMID: 17960402.
- Guo EL, Katta R. Diet and hair loss: effects of nutrient deficiency and supplement use. Dermatology Practical & Conceptual. 2017;7(1):1-10. PMID: 28243487.
- Evron E, Juhasz M, Babadjouni A, Mesinkovska NA. Natural hair supplement: Friend or foe? Saw palmetto, a systematic review in alopecia. Skin Appendage Disorders. 2020;6(6):329-337. PMID: 33313047.
We earn 4%/sale if you sign up · See all commissions
We earn 4%/sale if you sign up · See all commissions
We earn 4%/sale if you sign up · See all commissions
We earn 4%/sale if you sign up · See all commissions
We earn a 4% commission on Amazon purchases through our links. Our methodology page explains our full affiliate disclosure.